Monday, May 23 2022 Sign In   |    Register
Industry Data
Industry M&A
Power Plants
Nuclear Data

Home > Industry Data > South Carolina Detail Page

South Carolina Detail Page

Select another State


Regulated Suppliers
Contains a listing of the electric companies under state PUC jurisdiction.
Regulatory Summary
A quick summary of the regulatory activity in each state.

Regulatory Summary

03/00: Restructuring legislation, Senate Bill 1168, was introduced and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. The bill would allow retail direct access within three years in South Carolina. Debate and discussions continue in both the House and Senate, but few expect passage of a bill this session.

05/99: Three restructuring bills and one joint resolution calling for a study of restructuring the electric power industry have not been passed in the legislature. The legislature continues to debate and review the bill proposed by Representative Cato at this time.

03/99: Restructuring legislation was introduced. The bill calls for competition to be phased-in over 6 years and would allow regulators to determine how much utilities could recover in stranded costs.

12/98: A task force was appointed to study deregulation in South Carolina.

11/98: A restructuring bill was prefiled that would create a deregulation task force.

10/98: The PSC released a report on deregulation that stated the cost of deregulating the 3 large investor-owned utilities in the state would be about $1.4 billion. Stranded costs for South Carolina Electric and Gas were estimated to be $882 million; for Carolina Power & Light, $410 million; and for Duke Energy, $81 million. The Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, not regulated by the PUC, estimated its stranded costs (mostly associated with its part ownership in Catawba nuclear station) at $2.8 billion. The PMPA wanted recovery of its stranded costs to be spread across the State.

09/98: The PSC estimated stranded costs for Duke Energy at $81 million; for Carolina Power & Light at $410 million; for South Carolina Electric and Gas at $882 million; and for Lockhart Power Co, $0.

6/98: PSC decided to conduct stranded cost proceedings for the 4 investor-owned utilities in the State, expecting completion by the end of the year. 

4/98: The PSC requested utilities to calculate their stranded costs under a retail access scenario. 

2/98: PSC issues Proposed Electric Restructuring Implementation Process as requested by House Speaker. The plan calls for a five-year transition period following passage of legislation to deregulate the electric power industry.

   Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.