Monday, September 26 2022 Sign In   |    Register

News Quick Search



Front Page
Power News
Gas News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Sep 26
Week of Sep 19
Week of Sep 12
Week of Sep 05
Week of Aug 29
By Topic
By News Partner
News Customization


Pro Plus(+)

Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News

    Home > News > Gas News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    PG&E settles with confidential payout to family in 2015 natural gas explosion lawsuit

    August 12, 2022 - Steven Mayer, The Bakersfield Californian


      Aug. 12—In a surprise development connected to an ongoing civil lawsuit against PG&E and two locally owned companies, the giant utility said Thursday it has reached a settlement with plaintiffs in the case involving a fatal natural gas explosion south of Bakersfield.

      PG&E's lawyers were uncharacteristically absent in court Thursday morning, when Kern County Superior Court Judge Bernard Barmann Jr. instructed the jury on the new development.

      "PG&E is no longer a party to this case," Barmann told jurors.

      They are not to speculate why, Barmann said. And they are not to consider this in any future deliberations.

      In a statement provided to The Californian, PG&E acknowledged that it did indeed settle with the plaintiffs, including Gloria Ruckman and her mother, Amalia Leal, both of whom suffered serious burns when a high-pressure natural gas line exploded on Nov. 13, 2015, sending flames 200 feet into the air behind the Ruckman home.

      "Our thoughts continue to be with the those impacted by this tragic incident," PG&E said in the statement.

      "We have reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs," PG&E continued. "Safety is our most important responsibility and we remain committed to keeping our customers, coworkers, contractors and communities we serve safe."

      As with most such settlements, the details must remain confidential.

      Later Thursday morning, the evidence phase of the trial continued with the plaintiffs' attorneys, Daniel Rodriguez and Joseph Low, questioning a pair of witnesses.

      Robert Sandrini lived less than a quarter-mile from the Ruckmans when the 34-inch, high-pressure gas line erupted after it was struck by the driver of a soil ripper who was preparing the land for almond tree planting.

      The concussion from the explosion ripped the screens off the front of his house and caused Sandrini's wife to fall to the floor inside the house.

      The second witness, Rob Yamashita, is a PG&E gas program manager who oversees PG&E contractors. He has trained excavators and others in a number of skill areas, including "marking standards."

      Much of the case revolves around whether the path of the large transmission gas line was properly marked before excavation work began in the field.

      It begins with an 811 call, the national call-before-you-dig phone number. Utilities are provided with an "811 ticket."

      "We get the 811 ticket, review the ticket, look for any conflicts in the area and mark off" the conflict zones, Yamashita testified.

      They generally have 48 hours to mark off the area, which is intended to warn excavators when they get close to danger zones. They use paint, flags, stakes or sometimes a combination, the PG&E employee said.

      The civil trial is expected to last six weeks.

      Reporter Steven Mayer can be reached at 661-395-7353. Follow him on Facebook and on Twitter: @semayerTBC.


      (c)2022 The Bakersfield Californian (Bakersfield, Calif.)

      Visit The Bakersfield Californian (Bakersfield, Calif.) at

      Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


    Other Articles - Generation


       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.