WASHINGTON, Feb. 1 -- The U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued the following statement on Jan. 31, 2023, by Commissioner James Danly on a decision (Docket No. RP19-73-006) involving El Paso Natural Gas LLC:
* * *
I agree with the Commission's decision to approve El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.'s Offer of Settlement (Settlement).[1]
As I stated in my separate statement in Kinetica Deepwater Express, LLC, I suggest to anyone participating in the natural gas industry that it might be prudent to be clearer in your settlement agreements as to whether you are actually a party to that agreement.[2]
Though I understand that the use of an attachment listing parties supporting or not opposing a settlement is common in the industry,[3] situations will almost certainly arise in which an entity's status as party or non-party to a settlement will be dispositive.
This will be even more important should the issue be presented to a body less indifferent to fundamentals of contract law than this Commission.
For these reasons, I respectfully concur.
* * *
Footnotes:
[1] El Paso Nat. Gas Co., L.L.C., 182 FERC Sect. 61,045 (2023).
[2] Kinetica Deepwater Express, LLC, 175 FERC Sect. 61,048 (2021) (Danly, Comm'r, concurring in part and dissenting in part at P 10 n.12).
[3] See Settlement at Art. 3.1 (defining "Settling Party" as "mean[ing] (a) any party identified in Appendix A; or (b) any party, as that term is defined in 18 C.F.R. Sec. 385.102(c), and any shipper not identified in Appendix A that (i) expressly supports, or (ii) does not oppose the [Stipulation and Agreement] as a whole and/or any of its underlying provisions."); id. App. A (listing parties that "either support or do not oppose the Offer of Settlement including the [Stipulation and Agreement]").
* * *
Original text here: https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/commissioner-james-danly-concurrence-regarding-el-paso-natural-gas-company-llc
Front Page
Power News
Today's News
E-mail
Print
