Monday, January 24 2022 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Jan 24
Week of Jan 17
Week of Jan 10
Week of Jan 03
Week of Dec 27
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Activist investor Elliott calls for turbines-power lines split at SSE


    December 7, 2021 - Alliance News

     

      (Alliance News) - Activist hedge fund Elliott Management has publicly called for electricity utility SSE PLC to be broken up, a move which it claims could add more than GBP5 billion to the firm's value.

      Elliott said on Monday that it was unimpressed by a plan that Perth, Scotland-based SSE announced last month that would pour an extra GBP1 billion a year into wind farms and other investments.

      After months of lobbying SSE bosses behind closed doors, the US hedge fund on Monday launched a public broadside against the company.

      "We believe the market ignores GBP5 billion of value because of SSE's inefficient structure," it said.

      A split would allow a 30% jump from today's valuation, Elliott argued.

      Simply put, Elliott's argument hinges on a key point, which it claims many of the FTSE 100 firm's rivals have already accepted.

      The business is currently made up of two main parts – a business that builds wind turbines and other renewable generation, and a business that manages the electricity networks in parts of the UK.

      But analysts claim that the two businesses would attract very separate investors if they were split.

      Investors looking for stability from dividends would happily put their money into the networks arm, while those who want the company to invest and grow rapidly would throw money at the renewables arm.

      But having the two together might be putting off both types of investor.

      "Both companies would be able to tell their own unique equity stories clearly and focus on execution and appropriate capital allocation," Elliott said in a letter to SSE's chair on Monday.

      "As a result, investors would be able to value each entity at its fair value without applying a conglomerate discount."

      SSE Chief Executive Alistair Phillips-Davies said that he developed SSE's strategy that was released last month after talking to shareholders and taking independent advice.

      "Separation risks valuable growth options across the clean energy value chain, would jeopardise our ability to finance and deliver the major infrastructure the UK needs to create jobs and achieve net zero, and would lose shared skills that benefit the group," he said.

      "Separation does not support the financing of our core growth businesses and would rule out adjacent growth options, as well as reducing the resilience of the business model – it is not the right outcome to maximise value for shareholders or our other stakeholders."

      Sources familiar with the situation suggested that the most important thing that SSE could do to placate Elliott would be appointing board members with experience of the renewables sector.

      In its letter, Elliott said that the board of SSE is "inadequate".

      "Not one of SSE's independent board members has any meaningful operating experience in growing a large renewables business," it said.

      "This lack of expertise puts the company at a strong disadvantage to its competitors."

      SSE shares were up 0.4% on Tuesday at 1,637.50 pence. The stock is up 9.2% so far in 2021.

      By August Graham, PA City Reporter

      source: PA

    TOP

    Other Articles - International


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.