Friday, May 27 2022 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of May 23
Week of May 16
Week of May 09
Week of May 02
Week of Apr 25
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    New England opts for dirty, expensive energy


    January 21, 2022 - CE Noticias Financieras

     

      New England's electricity options on the U.S. East Coast are a mess. As in Japan, the region's power operators have shut down nuclear and coal plants, relying more on solar and wind power. But the unwillingness to build pipelines and upgrade power transmission creates a costlier, dirtier and potentially more unstable system.

      The power grid in the area, which includes six northeastern states, plans to shut down or has already shut down about 7,000 megawatts of power generation over the past decade, mostly from coal and nuclear power. Natural gas, which now provides half the region's power, and green energy from wind and other sources have filled the gap. Cost is partly a reason. Wind power is free and gas is cheap. So energy sources with high regulatory burdens or those that can't quickly begin to take advantage of price spikes can't compete.

      The problem is that New England's current pipeline structure cannot meet demand during cold snaps. Additional pipeline projects, such as the $3 billion (E2.6 billion) Kinder Morgan project, have been abandoned in the face of political opposition. Increasing hydropower transmission from places like Quebec, Canada, could balance wind and solar, allow dirty plants to shut down and provide power when gas lines run out. But in December, Maine voters rejected a proposed project. A similar plan was rejected by New Hampshire regulators in 2018.

      The New England grid operator warned in December that a winter as cold as 2014 could lead to blackouts. Paying more to keep existing supplies available, such as a 2019 agreement with one of the region's two remaining nuclear plants, and an agreement to keep a gas plant open until 2024 to subsidize a nearby liquefied natural gas (LNG) import facility, are stopgaps. The addition of offshore wind, which shows promise, takes years to get off the ground and still requires backup.

      New Englanders are not alone in policy incoherence. Texas doesn't like blackouts, but won't build transmission to prevent them. Japan and Germany want to decarbonize while shutting down nuclear plants, which increases emissions and dependence on imported gas, subject to price swings. In Japan, for example, the share of coal has increased since the Fukushima catastrophe, and that of LNG even more, leading to occasional price swings. In the previous January, wholesale power prices in Japan reached E2,100 per megawatt-hour, or about 12 times Monday afternoon's inflated New England prices.

      Power grids are fabulously complex, and voters often think power and transmission problems are one-offs. Another cold winter could make them regret their lack of options.

      The authors are Reuters Breakingviews columnists. The opinions are their own. The translation, by Carlos Gómez Abajo, is the responsibility of CincoDías.

    TOP

    Other Articles - Utility Business / General


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.