Monday, May 23 2022 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of May 23
Week of May 16
Week of May 09
Week of May 02
Week of Apr 25
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Energy & Climate CounselFoley Hoag LLP New York Public Service Commission Issues Key Ruling On Offshore Wind Transmission


    January 27, 2022 - By Mr Peter Ross

     

      On January 20, 2022, the New York Public Service Commission (Commission) issued its Order on Power Grid Study Recommendations concerning investments in the State's electric transmission and distribution system that are necessary to meet the mandates of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA). The Order focused mainly on changes to New York's offshore wind program, but also addressed future onshore bulk transmission planning needs, Renewable Energy Zones (REZs), and approaches to deploying advanced technologies.

      The Order is the latest step in a process that began in 2020, when the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act directed State agencies and other stakeholders to undertake a comprehensive study of transmission and distribution system upgrades needed to meet the CLCPA's targets. In January 2021, the Department of Public Service Staff, working with NYSERDA, filed their Initial Report on the power grid study (Initial Report).

      The Order adopts key transmission-related modifications to New York's offshore wind program, signaling strongly and for the first time that New York will move toward a "meshed" offshore wind transmission system instead of the previously favored "radial" interconnection approach. Project-specific radial lines directly run from each individual offshore wind farm to the onshore grid, whereas with a meshed network, projects are interconnected to each other via an offshore grid, which is further connected to the onshore system. The Commission stated, "[W]e are not in a position today to decide on whether to modify the Commissions existing preference for a direct radial approach to the offshore wind transmission. However, the information and comments in the record to date suggest that it is time to consider a different approach." That different approach, the Commission ordered, should include at the outset that NYSERDA's future offshore wind renewable energy credit (OREC) procurements require offshore wind projects be designed to accommodate a meshed transmission network, and that NYSERDA will include in its form OREC purchase and sale agreements pricing provisions to accommodate the possibility of injection into multiple zones within the New York Control Area. The Commission's decision considered the increasing amount of offshore wind developers and available lease sites, the potential savings of a meshed network, and the relatively small increase in project costs due to future-proofing (noted by the Commission to be .4% of project cost for the construction of a mesh-ready substation).

      The Order also directs NYSERDA to include eligibility criteria in its offshore wind procurements that would require the use of high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission where appropriate to preserve maximum efficient use of constrained cable corridors, which has been a particular issue in New York City's harbor and rivers. While cheaper to build, alternating current (AC) lines carry less capacity than DC lines of the same physical size, and using HVDC lines provides significant technical benefits over high-voltage AC, including power flow controls and easier black start capabilities.

      After reviewing the Initial Report, the Commission also found that additional work is needed to identify plausible scenarios for interconnecting offshore wind generation into New York City. Noting that "recent developments call into question . . . assumptions in the base case" of the Initial Report, particularly related to proposed interconnection locations of Tier 4 transmission projects and offshore wind farms currently under development, the Commission determined that "additional work is needed to identify plausible scenarios for interconnecting offshore wind generation into New York City at levels identified . . . ." The Commission further authorized Con Edison to file a petition on its proposed "Clean Energy Hub" that could accommodate 3,000 MWs of offshore wind capacity in New York City.

      With respect to energy storage, the Commission noted the study's projection that by 2040 over 4,000 MWs of storage will be needed in New York City alone and over 3,000 MWs on Long Island, and authorized NYSERDA to award additional scoring credit in the economic-benefits-and-viability categories for energy storage facilities integrated in offshore wind proposals, provided such facilities are located in New York City or Long Island.

      With respect to the "Renewable Energy Zones" that some have proposed, the Commission stated that its coordinated planning processes will timely support achievement of the CLCPA's goals, and determined no need to create a separate REZ process.

      In terms of what comes next, NYSERDA will integrate these changes concerning meshed network optionality, OREC redesign, and energy storage into the next OREC solicitation, which is expected to be released later this year. Con Edison will file a petition on its proposed Clean Energy Hub, which interested parties will likely have an opportunity to comment upon. New York's transmission planning continues to be dynamic on the policy front so we expect further changes and refinements as markets develop and the State's energy transition continues.

      To view Foley Hoag's Law and the Environment Blog please click here

      The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

      Mr Peter Ross

      Foley Hoag LLP

      Seaport West

      155 Seaport Boulevard

      Boston

      MA US 02210-2600

      UNITED STATES

      Tel: 6178321000

      Fax: 617 8327000

      E-mail: ACallanan@foleyhoag.com

      URL: www.foleyhoag.com

    TOP

    Other Articles - Utility Business / General


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.