Sunday, July 3 2022 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Jun 27
Week of Jun 20
Week of Jun 13
Week of Jun 06
Week of May 30
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Arizona nuclear plant seeking alternative source of water


    May 9, 2022 - Ryan Randazzo / The Arizona Republic

     

      PHOENIX – The largest nuclear power plant in the U.S. is still looking for an alternative water source after scuttling plans to pump brackish groundwater west of Phoenix it first pursued in 2019. The Palo Verde Generating Station is the only nuclear plant in the world not adjacent to a large body of water to cool the plant. Instead, it uses reclaimed water piped more than 35 miles across the desert. That water is getting more expensive, and to keep the plant economical, Arizona Public Service Co. is exploring ways to use it wiser, including a test project with Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, this summer, the Arizona Republic reported. The plant uses about 65 million gallons of treated wastewater every day – more than 23 billion gallons a year – to generate electricity. The contract with cities to sell the plant the treated wastewater runs through 2050 and gets more expensive after 2025. "That's just a fact of what is in our water contracts and it is important to us to look for ways to operate more cost-effectively," said Brad Berles, general manager of Palo Verde water resources. The water from the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant cost $53 an acre-foot in 2010. It will cost $300 an acre-foot in 2025. Starting in 2026, water rates will be set using a tiered formula, rising with water use. One acre-foot is approximately 326,000 gallons, or enough water to supply three single-family households in Phoenix for a year. APS is working with Sandia on a dry-cooling pilot project to be built at the New Mexico laboratory. Nuclear fuel is used to heat water in the plant and make steam. After steam from the plant spins a turbine and makes electricity, it is sent to large cooling towers outside the plant where much of it evaporates away. The Sandia project will study cooling the water before it goes to those towers. "If we send cooler water to the towers ... we can reduce what we evaporate off," Berles said. Cooling the water with fans or other mechanisms would of course use energy. The point of the research is to determine whether the cost of the equipment and energy to run it would save money by reducing water use. "It's a balance just like everything we look at," Berles said. "You've got to evaluate the pros and cons of it." Testing should begin in May or June, and gather data for four to six months. "We are probably multiple years out from when we would do anything at the plant," he said. Another option APS is reviewing is adding another water-treatment facility to the nuclear plant. The wastewater that Palo Verde receives is treated before it's used at the plant. Water is usually cycled through the plant and cooling towers about 25 times before it becomes too saline for another use. Once the chemistry of the water makes it unusable in the plant, it is pumped to massive evaporation ponds on the property where it simply dries up. APS is evaluating whether it would be cost-effective to treat the water again, after it's used in the plant, to extend its useful life. "There are different technologies that exist currently and new technologies being pursued by vendors in the water industry," Berles said. "There's a lot of ideas that people have out there."

    TOP

    Other Articles - Generation


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.