Sunday, August 14 2022 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Aug 08
Week of Aug 01
Week of Jul 25
Week of Jul 18
Week of Jul 11
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility: Minnesota Power Plant Must Undergo Environmental Review


    June 24, 2022 - Targeted News Service

     

      ST. PAUL, Minnesota, June 24 (TNSpol) -- Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility issued the following news release on June 23, 2022:

      The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) ordered an environmental review of Great River Energy's (GRE) proposed alterations to the Cambridge 2 peaking plant today. The decision is in response to a petition by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), Clean Up the River Environment (CURE), and the Sierra Club North Star Chapter demanding environmental review of the electric generation and transmission cooperative's proposed project.

      The Cambridge 2 facility, located in Cambridge, Minnesota, is a "peaking" power plant designed to supply on-demand additional energy to the grid when demand for electricity spikes. Currently, Cambridge 2 runs exclusively on natural gas. But a GRE request for the Commission to approve a "minor alteration" of the facility's existing 2005 permit seeks to change that. If granted, the proposed alterations would allow for Cambridge 2 to become a "dual fuel" facility--one that burns either natural gas or fuel oil--without requiring the Commission to review the environmental, human, and economic impacts that burning fuel oil may have.

      In petitioning for environmental review under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), PEER, CURE, and Sierra Club argued that constructing and operating the proposed facility has the potential for significant environmental impacts. Especially concerning are the potential increases in hourly emission rates for carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), particulate matter, mercury, and lead. The human health impacts of these air pollutants are well-documented and range from decreased lung function and aggravation of existing respiratory diseases like asthma to nonfatal heart attacks and premature death for those with heart or lung disease. The surrounding community is already over-exposed to traffic pollution and this new facility would make existing environmental harms worse.

      The Commission agreed, stating that the petition indisputably raised potential significant impacts that had to be studied under MEPA. The Commission ordered the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), which lays out potential environmental impacts to determine whether a full environmental review is required. PEER and CURE are pleased with the Commission's decision.

      "As the Commission identified, this proposal to burn fuel oil in Cambridge could harm the environment and human health and needs to be studied" said Hudson Kingston, Litigation and Policy Attorney at PEER. "GRE could save lives, and potentially money, opting for twenty-first century technology like batteries rather than doubling down on fossil fuels. We support the preparation of a full Environmental Impact Statement considering both cumulative impacts and better alternatives once this preliminary EAW is completed."

      "Completing an EAW is a step in the right direction and will allow for a more transparent process in which rural electric cooperative member-owners can have a say in how they get their power," said Sarah Mooradian, Government Relations and Policy Director at CURE. "We want to ensure that in preparing for changing power needs in a changing climate that GRE and other electricity generation and transmission companies don't inadvertently exacerbate the problem by burning more fossil fuels and emitting more greenhouse gases."

      The Commission will next address whether to grant Great River Energy's application for a minor alteration. Members of the public can submit their comments until 4:30 pm on July 1, 2022.

      * * *

      Original text here: https://peer.org/minnesota-power-plant-must-undergo-environmental-review/

    TOP

    Other Articles - Environmental


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.