Friday, October 7 2022 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Oct 03
Week of Sep 26
Week of Sep 19
Week of Sep 12
Week of Sep 05
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Helling: Fight against the nuclear reactor


    August 1, 2022 - Staff Writer

     

      Editor:

      "For 50 years, nuclear power stations have produced three products which only a lunatic would want: bomb-explosive plutonium, lethal radioactive waste and electricity so dear it has to be heavily subsidized. They leave to future generations the task, and most of the cost, of making safe sites that have been polluted half-way to eternity." James Buchan.

      Wyomingites should fight to prevent an experimental "demonstration" nuclear reactor in Kemmerer with all of their might. The design uses liquid sodium as a coolant. Liquid sodium will catch fire and burn upon contact with the air or with water. This technology has a history filled with meltdowns.

      Sodium reactors are not used in the U.S. at this time, after previous failures. A sodium-cooled reactor has never been successfully operated in the U.S., according to Arnie Gunderson, a former nuclear industry executive.

      Meanwhile, the uranium needed for this "demonstration reactor" is a more highly enriched, bomb-grade uranium, most of which would have to be imported from Russia. It would come with an increased risk of nuclear proliferation.

      There are no storage facilities for nuclear waste and the plan is to store the waste onsite in Wyoming. When the Russians invaded Ukraine this year there was a threat of another Chernobyl disaster, as over 20,000 spent fuel rods were still being cooled onsite. The initial meltdown was in 1986.

      I have consulted with S.W. Lawrence, M.D., an environmentalist and a writer on climate systems, energy systems, the electrical grid, and epidemiology. He told me it would be difficult to de-commission a nuclear plant like this. The limited electricity it would produce would be expensive.

      Nuclear is heavily subsidized by the government. The plant would be vulnerable to cyber and other terrorist attacks. Wyoming was likely selected for this experimental reactor because the offer of jobs and money was thought to be too much for Wyomingites to turn down.

      The whole state should be concerned. Wyoming is too pristine and beautiful to sell out to nuclear. Let's stand together and fight this with all of our might.

    TOP

    Other Articles - International


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.