Wednesday, February 1 2023 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Jan 30
Week of Jan 23
Week of Jan 16
Week of Jan 09
Week of Jan 02
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    German Offshore Wind Is Not An Example To Follow


    November 16, 2022 - PA Pundits

     

      By Bonner Cohen, Ph.D. ~

      We’re supposed to learn from our mistakes, but let’s face it, as often as not we don’t. If we’re not willing to face up to our own blunders, why not take note of others’ miscues?

      The Biden administration is hot to trot to install giant, industrial-scale wind facilities along the U.S. East Coast, and bureaucrats at the Interior Department, which has jurisdiction over such things, are eager to sign off on new projects. But if they really had the best interests of taxpayers, ratepayers, and the environment in mind, they would ask themselves how things have worked out in Germany, which is ahead of the U.S. in offshore wind development.

      Germany’s experience has not been a happy one.

      Two decades into its much-acclaimed “Energiewende” (energy transition), Germany’s loving embrace of wind (and solar) has been a complete failure. And nowhere has that failure been more obvious than in offshore wind.

      Germany’s North Sea and Baltic Sea coasts are indeed blustery and would appear ideally suited for the green energy future that global elites are determined to impose on the benighted masses. Thousands of giant turbines blight the country’s coastline, but the monstrosities have come up short when it comes to producing reliable and affordable energy. Germany has the highest electricity prices in Europe, with monthly power bills averaging three times higher than what they are in the U.S. As is the case in all offshore wind projects, the unsightly turbines rapidly lose efficiency as soon as they go into operation. In addition, the turbines frequently malfunction, forcing them to undergo “routine maintenance” on a regular basis. By the time they reach age 20, offshore turbines are useless and need to be replaced – at great expense.

      Manufacturing Sector in a Pinch

      Germany has long been a leader in manufacturing, a sector than demands a lot of energy. Heavy manufacturing requires intense heat, the kind of heat that wind (offshore or onshore) and solar simply cannot deliver. That’s why successive German governments, while dumping billions in subsidies for wind and solar power, continued to support importing natural gas from Russia; it provided reliability that no wind turbines or solar panels will ever produce. With Russian natural gas exports to Germany being throttled as a result of the war in Ukraine, German manufacturers are scrambling to line up reliable liquified natural gas (LNG) sources they can import.

      Still determined to boost the country’s use of “renewable” energy, German officials are allowing the use of biomass, or the burning o wood, to produce energy. Burning wood for energy pollutes the air far more than the coal-fired plants Germany has taken out of mothballs after Vladimir Putin cut back the flow of Russian natural gas.

      Environmental Damage

      Aside from its failure to live up to its billing as an energy source, offshore wind makes a mockery of claims that it is clean. “For example,” notes Jason Isaak, director of LifePowered at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, “every offshore wind turbine requires a ton (literally) of neodymium, which is mined almost exclusively in China with total disregard for the environment. Firsthand accounts of China’s rare earth mines tell of lakes of toxic sludge and ‘cancer villages’ where people and livestock suffer devastating sickness from the mines’ waste.”

      The commitment to renewable energy – whether in Germany, the United States, or anywhere else – is a commitment to human suffering and environmental degradation on a grand scale. It will not save the planet from a non-existent “climate crisis,” but it will line the pockets of the very few at the expense of the very many.

      Bonner R. Cohen, Ph. D. is a senior policy analyst with the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) where he focuses on natural resources, energy, property rights, and geopolitical developments.

      Read more excellent articles at CFACT http://www.cfact.org/


      The views expressed in content distributed by Newstex and its re-distributors (collectively, "Newstex Authoritative Content") are solely those of the respective author(s) and not necessarily the views of Newstex et al. It is provided as general information only on an "AS IS" basis, without warranties and conferring no rights, which should not be relied upon as professional advice. Newstex et al. make no claims, promises or guarantees regarding its accuracy or completeness, nor as to the quality of the opinions and commentary contained therein.

    TOP

    Other Articles - International


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.