Wednesday, February 1 2023 Sign In   |    Register
 

News Quick Search


 

News


Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Jan 30
Week of Jan 23
Week of Jan 16
Week of Jan 09
Week of Jan 02
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization
Feedback

 

Pro Plus(+)


Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News
  •  



    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Floating offshore wind is very bad fit for the coast


    November 16, 2022 - Chinook Observer

     

      Adverse impacts to coastal fish-dependent communities must also be considered and quality of life on the coast must be preserved when mammoth new emerging untested industrial projects propose to displace our fishing industry.

      Floating offshore wind is very bad fit for the coast, and anyone forced to purchase the exorbitant high priced offshore power.

      As important as it may be to attempt to fight climate change, the result must be a benefit for all our citizens, and not just a benefit for large urban centers at the expense of disparaging the coast - widening the urban/coastal divide.

      Adverse impacts to coastal fish-dependent communities must also be considered and quality of life on the coast must be preserved when mammoth new emerging untested industrial projects propose to displace our fishing industry.

      The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management offshore lease process is broken and needs to be repaired. BOEM's broken process was on full display as BOEM proposed offshore lease areas in southern Oregon of 2,200 square miles of ocean and did not inform the state of Oregon until 18 hours before making that overly aggressive announcement public. The BOEM process is lease ocean first and "maybe" ask questions much later as the potential lessee oversees developing the science to install floating offshore wind.

      This is a worst-case scenario of the fox guarding the hen house when the developer is in charge of producing the science. How can anyone expect a developer to do anything except put the science forward to move the offshore wind lease to fruition, after they have invested heavily with hundreds of millions of dollars to acquire an ocean lease. Adverse impacts to coastal people must matter, too, as a significant part of the BOEM lease process.

      The BOEM western regional director that will sign any offshore industrial leases has recently stated, "All BOEM does is make a place for floating offshore wind to develop and BOEM has no authority to control any impacts on nearby coastal communities." This wrong, wrong, wrong! The congressional Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act policy statement regarding ocean development in 43 USC 1332 (2) is very clear that "this subchapter shall be construed in such a manner that the character of the waters above the outer Continental Shelf as high seas and the right to navigation and fishing therein shall not be affected."

      The U.S. Coast Guard comes to the rescue with wide vessel traffic fairways proposed offshore Oregon and Washington out to almost 100 fathoms off Pacific County. Recently, Sen. Maria Cantwell accompanied USCG Commandant Fagan from Washington, D.C. to Cape Disapoointment and met with the fishing industry in Ilwaco. The industry fully supports the USCG protection of vessel traffic as proposed in their Pacific Coast Port Access Route Study report.

      At the recent Washington Sea Grant crabber/towlane meeting in Astoria, BOEM acknowledged the USCG Fairways as vessel traffic protection and did not attempt to suggest any modification. If these fairways moves forward in the future as proposed they will protect and preserve our important access necessary to the viability of our fish-dependent community - viability that would be destroyed by the industrial takeover of over 700 square miles of our local offshore waters. This must be done to preserve Pacific County as the fourth most fish dependent community in the nation.

      USCG fairways will also prevent the excess forced price gouging initiated by offshore wind in local power bills that will increase a minimum of 10 times from about $0.08/kw to over $0.80/kW, as estimated by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, forcing our citizens to choose between lighting, heating and eating. That NREL estimate was done before this recent high bout of inflation.

      Floating offshore wind is bad for the well being and quality of life of all our citizens and will only push inflation rates to new highs.

    TOP

    Other Articles - Utility Business / General


    TOP

       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.