Wednesday, February 1 2023 Sign In   |    Register

News Quick Search



Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Jan 30
Week of Jan 23
Week of Jan 16
Week of Jan 09
Week of Jan 02
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization


Pro Plus(+)

Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News

    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    UK households facing GBP800 million more due to onshore wind farm ban

    December 2, 2022 - Alliance News


      (Alliance News) - Government policies over the last decade which hampered the roll-out of onshore wind power in Britain might be adding close to a billion pounds to energy bills this winter, new analysis suggests.

      Without a 2016 decision to effectively ban the construction of onshore wind in most parts of England developers could have built enough turbines to generate around 2.5 terawatt hours of energy – enough to power 1.5 million homes through the winter.

      This would also have reduced the need to use gas power plants, saving 4.9 TWh of gas which could be used to heat more than half a million homes, research from the Energy & Climate Change Intelligence Unit suggests.

      Onshore wind farms would also have benefited from being included in government-backed funding schemes, the analysis said.

      Between them the decisions might have added around GBP800 million to bills this winter.

      "This analysis shows how banning onshore wind has left us more reliant on expensive gas this winter, exposing more families and businesses to the effects of Putin's invasion of Ukraine," said Simon Clarke, a Conservative Member of Parliament pushing for the ban to be lifted.

      "We shouldn't go back to the old system of imposing wind farms on people but give communities a genuine say.

      "Unlocking Britain's wind potential, where communities agree, would cut everyone's energy bills and allow local residents to benefit from rebates for hosting these cheap renewables."

      In the five years before the ban around 330 megawatts of onshore wind were hooked up to the grid every year, the analysis found.

      But just 270 MW was installed in the combined six years since it was implemented.

      By this winter an extra 1.7 gigawatts of capacity could have been added to Britain's electricity network, ECIU said.

      The organisation said that its own polling suggests around a quarter of Conservative party voters support onshore wind farms in their areas, compared with a fifth who would oppose any plans.

      Proponents of the technology argue that it is quicker, cheaper and easier to install and maintain than offshore wind. However, both technologies, and more, are likely to be needed to reach the country's environmental goals.

      ECIU Head of Analysis Simon Cran-McGreehin said: "Putting in place the ban on onshore wind has cost bill payers dear this winter.

      "This alongside a lost decade of installing insulation in homes has left many households paying hundreds of pounds more and the taxpayer picking up the rest of the tab through the energy price freeze."

      source: PA


    Other Articles - International


       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.