Monday, March 20 2023 Sign In   |    Register

News Quick Search



Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Mar 20
Week of Mar 13
Week of Mar 06
Week of Feb 27
Week of Feb 20
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization


Pro Plus(+)

Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News

    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    We might not beat China, but it shouldn't take 13 years to develop offshore wind farms

    January 26, 2023 - Sam Richards


      BRITAIN was once at the forefront of technological innovation and ground-breaking engineering. But what is Britain world class at now? Tony Danker, the director general of the CBI, has an answer: he believes we're world class "at being an impossible place" to build basically anything.

      He's not wrong. Extortionate energy bills, unaffordable studio flats in Zone 5, 15 years of sluggish productivity growth - scratch any of the economic challenges facing Britain and you'll find our broken planning system lurking beneath the surface.

      In his first major speech of the year yesterday, Danker identified clean growth as a massive opportunity for the UK. But it's one we're squandering because planning and consent for major projects takes far too long.

      It takes up to 13 years to get a new offshore wind farm up and running - yet actually building them takes just a fraction of this time - up to 3 years. Significantly more time is spent on getting planning consent for projects, carrying out increasingly lengthy environmental impact assessments, and seeing off potential legal challenges.

      There's an incorrect assumption that speeding up the planning process for building new wind turbines or solar farms means trashing environmental protections. In fact, Britain (and England in particular) has become one of the most nature-depleted places in the world under the existing system.

      Why not instead divert some of the resources currently being expended on compiling fruitless environmental impact assessments, which regularly stretch to 10,000 plus pages, directly towards funds for nature restoration projects?

      Offshore wind is one area where we are genuinely world class. Last week I met with firms in the Port of Blyth already benefiting from the clean growth opportunity Danker highlighted, designing and manufacturing the kit we need to install massive turbines miles into the North Sea. They're ready and willing to scale up: quite simply if we speed up deployment of new sources of clean cheap power, they can hire more people to build and sell more.

      China built more renewable capacity last year alone than the entire UK grid. With the US's Inflation Reduction Act set to drive an American renewable energy gold rush and the EU mapping out their rival plan, we can't afford to be stuck in the slow lane, or enacting self-defeating policies such as the effective ban on new onshore wind farms in England.

      We may not be able to outspend our rivals, but we can at least remove the barriers holding back our genuinely world leading sectors: speed up offshore wind, solar, and nuclear, and unlock the cheapest source of power -onshore wind. This will not only make our energy more affordable, it will create a huge number of goodquality jobs in places that have been crying out for investment for far too long. Places like Blyth, like Teesside, like the North West and the Midlands. Where once financing was the barrier to building clean energy projects, today the City stands ready to deploy its heavyweight financial firepower to make these projects a reality, and make Britain a global centre for green finance.

      There is a highly skilled workforce ready to unleash Britain's clean energy potential, delivering abundant clean power that will cut energy bills across the country - but we need to remove the planning barriers and get Britain building.

      £ Sam Richards is chief executive officer of Britain Remade

      Speeding up planning for wind farms doesn't mean trashing the environment


    Other Articles - International


       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.