Tuesday, March 21 2023 Sign In   |    Register

News Quick Search



Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Mar 20
Week of Mar 13
Week of Mar 06
Week of Feb 27
Week of Feb 20
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization


Pro Plus(+)

Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News

    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    BLM prefers smaller Lava Ridge wind project

    January 26, 2023 - Capital Press


      The proposed Lava Ridge wind project - one of the largest in the nation - could ultimately shrink.

      The U.S. Bureau of Land Management's two preferred alternatives call for a smaller project area and fewer turbines, the agency said Jan. 20 in announcing that the project's Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available.

      Release of the Draft EIS triggered a comment period through March 21. A Final EIS could come as soon as this summer, and a Record of Decision in the fall.

      The preferred alternatives seek to balance clean energy production with reduced potential for impacts on historic, cultural, tribal and land-use values, BLM's Twin Falls District said in a release.

      Magic Valley Energy LLC, an affiliate of LS Power, seeks authorization to build the project in Jerome, Lincoln and Minidoka counties. It would be about 25 miles northeast of Twin Falls, mainly on public land.

      The developer's preferred Alternative B calls for up to 400 turbines on 197,474 acres and sites all components within a series of corridors. Each corridor would be about a half-mile wide and cover 84,385 acres.

      A 500-kilovolt line would connect to Idaho Power Co.'s Midpoint Substation, or at a new substation within a right-of-way corridor.

      Associated infrastructure - all on public land - would include new and improved roads, power lines and substations as well as facilities for operations and maintenance and battery storage. Generation capacity would be 1 gigawatt or more. Lava Ridge would be one of the country's biggest wind projects.

      BLM prefers smaller-scale alternatives C and E. Identifying a preferred alternative does not imply it will be incorporated into a final decision, the agency said.

      The Draft EIS "provides ample data to show the preferred alternatives will reduce potential impacts to grazing allotments, wildlife and places of cultural importance," Luke Papez, Magic Valley Energy senior director of project development, said in a release. And it "clearly outlines the benefits of the project," including its economic impact and clean-energy contribution. He could not be reached.

      Alternative C calls for a project area of 146,389 acres and up to 378 turbines. It removes some siting corridors in the southwestern and northern portions to avoid or minimize potential impacts to Wilson Butte Cave, Minidoka National Historic Site and associated impact on the Native American and Japanese American communities. It also removes siting corridors to reduce the potential to fragment wildlife habitat.

      Alternative E's smaller project area and fewer turbines - 122,444 acres and up to 269 turbines - aim to lessen bat and bird mortality, and potential conflicts with livestock grazing, BLM said. This alternative also would reduce the visual impact to the historic site by removing siting corridors directly east.


    Other Articles - Utility Business / General


       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.