Energy Central Professional



Ben Payton  


    Africa has a gaping hole in its energy supply. Six hun- dred million people, around half of the continent's population, lack access to electricity. Without much faster pro- gress, the continent will miss the UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of achieving universal access to elec- tricity by 2030.

    There are obvious advantages to filling Africa's electricity gap using renewable energy, including from wind. On top of the climate benefits, both onshore and offshore wind are increasingly able to deliver lower-cost power than fossil fuels. According to the International Renewable Ener- gy Agency, almost two-thirds of new renewable energy capacity installed in 2020 generated cheaper electricity than would have been available from the lowest-cost fossil fuel alternative. The cost benefits have since become even larger, owing to the massive in- crease in gas costs over the past year.

    Africa is blessed with abundant wind resources. Research commis- sioned for the IFC in 2020 found that the continent's wind resources could supply its electricity demand 250 times over.

    "It is only recently that we have realised what a good wind resource there is in sub-Saharan Africa," says Linda Munyengeterwa, the IFC's regional industry director for infra- structure in Africa. "In many areas of the continent the wind tends to blow strongest at night and in the early morning. It is very complementary to solar, which only generates during the day."

    Yet progress in harnessing pow- er from wind has been limited. The Global Wind Energy Council notes that Africa is only using 0.01% of the 59,000 gigawatts (GW) that the IFC says is available on the continent. And according to data published by the In- ternational Renewable Energy Agen- cy (IRENA) in April, only three Afri- can countries - Egypt, Morocco and South Africa - have installed more than 1 GW of wind energy capacity.


    "The development of a windfarm is much more complicated and costly than that for a solar plant," says Vuyo Ntoi, joint-MD at African Infrastruc- ture Investment Managers. Before developers can begin putting turbines in the ground, they need to collect data on the wind resources available at a possible site. This can be an ex- pensive and lengthy process.

    "For solar, short-term irradiation data can be readily purchased (at low cost) and used, while for a windfarm a longer programme of wind moni- toring on-site at the proposed hub- height is required to underpin the project's bankability."

    Ntoi adds that wind is generally less suited to smaller projects, some of which may generate off-grid elec- tricity, compared to solar. Wind, he says, "does not easily lend itself to implementation outside of govern- ment led programmes," owing to the "nature of its permitting and procure- ment complexity, lack of co-location ability and hence reliance on national grids, plus the need for scale".

    The result is that wind develop- ments are unlikely to proceed without a reliable off-taker. These are hard to come by in Africa. "There is real ex- perience of payment difficulties with financially constrained utilities across the continent," says Ntoi. "Wind de- velopers as with other energy devel- opers are loath to develop projects into an ecosystem with poor credit quality where generators will not get the contractual payments they are en- titled to."

    Chris Chijiutomi, managing direc- tor and head of infrastructure equity for Africa and Pakistan at British In- ternational Investment, agrees that the lack of creditworthiness among African utilities is a "core bottleneck".

    Another challenge, he adds, is "the general indebtedness of African coun- tries, in terms of governments being able to offer guarantees that would then allow the private sector to know that they can come in and invest".

    "The poor fiscal positions of a lot of countries," says Chijiutomi, "is now creating limiting space for them to of- fer sovereign guarantees or letters of support needed to ensure contractual obligations are met."

    In addition to financial guarantees, the ability of many African govern- ments to provide security guarantees is also questionable. Patrick Edmond, senior consultant at strategic risk ad- visory firm Africa Matters Limited, notes that several areas with good wind power potential are exposed to security risks.

    "The interiors of Chad, Sudan, Ni- ger and Mauritania are hard to ac- cess, and the state has very limited presence in these remote regions," he says. "Northern Nigeria has some po- tential and huge demand, but major security challenges."


    Wind project developers in Africa, as throughout the world, also face challenges in addressing community opposition to new facilities. Such is- sues have been particularly intense in Kenya. A man was shot dead by po- lice during protests against a planned windfarm in Kinangop in 2015; the $144m project was cancelled the fol- lowing year.

    The Lake Turkana Wind Power Project - the largest in Africa - has also faced sustained opposition. Last year, a Kenyan court ruled that title deeds for the project site were acquired in an irregular manner. The ruling did not cancel the deeds, but paves the way for the local communi- ty to receive compensation.

    The fact that the turbines that make up a windfarm are likely to be dis- persed over a wide area adds a layer of complexity. "When it comes to wind, the sites are not necessarily stan- dalone, or defined in an ideal square area," says Chijiutomi. "You're then having to deal with a lot more commu- nity and a lot more environmental and social issues associated with that."

    Some countries have attempted to evade the social conflicts around windfarms by prioritising offshore developments. In Africa, however, the development of significant off- shore wind capacity appears a distant prospect.

    Even South Africa, a leader in the development of onshore wind power, has yet to see significant movement towards harnessing its offshore re- sources. Niveshen Govender, CEO of the South African Wind Energy As- sociation, reports that the country is unlikely to see offshore projects until at least 2030.

    "A lot of the deterrent around off- shore is more around the capital costs," says Chijiutomi, citing the heavy cost of getting the installation done offshore and, more importantly, getting the connecting transmission lines to where the electricity is needed.

    In fact, the challenge of connecting turbines to transmission lines is also a major problem for onshore pro- jects - especially for those located in remote areas, far from existing grid infrastructure.

    "The worst thing that can happen - and has happened in some instanc- es - is to have the power plant ready but the grid connection infrastructure isn't," warns Chijiutomi. "Then the government or whoever the off-taker is, is paying for energy that they can't use because there's no grid connec- tion."

    This is precisely the situation that afflicted the Lake Turkana project. The windfarm itself was completed on schedule in 2017. But the Kenyan gov- ernment fell behind in the construc- tion of a new 272-mile transmission line, after the Italian company it had hired to build the line went bankrupt. Electricity from the project was not delivered to the grid until 15 months after the turbines were completed


    The Lake Turkana project is hardly alone among complex infrastructure projects in facing delays. Indeed, de- spite its troubles, it now supplies 17% of Kenya's electricity generation ca- pacity and was cited by management consultants BCG as a "best practice" example of an energy project in Africa.

    Further insights in scaling a wind rollout come from South Africa. The development of wind power in the country was hamstrung for several years during the rule of its disgraced former president, Jacob Zuma. Since 2018, however, its independent pow- er producer programme has regained momentum. A dozen wind projects were given the go-ahead that year, followed by another 12 in November 2021. A further bidding round kicked off just six months later.

    The regular nature of bidding rounds has proven key to enabling developers to achieve scale and re- duce costs. "With each project pro- curement round, the tariff for wind energy has reduced considerably," Govender points out. "Policy shifts indicate a clear direction in terms of plans to procure new generation capacity on an ongoing basis, in line with the energy roadmap, which sees 14.4 GW of new wind power over the next decade."

    Ntoi agrees that "regular, pre- dictable and repeatable government backed procurement is probably the most important action that will en- able large scale wind power deploy- ment in Africa".

    He notes that South Africa has been "programmatic, therefore predicta- ble" in its approach to developing the sector. "Parties have developed wind- farms, with all the associated costs and effort, in order to bid into the re- newable energy procurement process. Because it's a programme, developers know that there is repeat business and that if you are not successful in one round, there will be another to follow."

    The growing role of wind in South Africa highlights how the technology can ultimately contribute to closing the continent's electricity gap. South Africa is, of course, an outlier in the way that its electricity market is con- siderably larger than in most African countries.

    But, says Chijiutomi, the extension of cross-border electricity transmis- sion infrastructure could allow small- er countries to play host to large-scale windfarms. "I think there's also an opportunity where some of these countries that maybe have the wind resource, but their grid isn't stable, could be a producer of the wind re- source and be able to sell it to neigh- bouring countries." n

    Only three African countries - Egypt, Morocco and South Africa - have installed more than 1 GW of wind energy capacity.

    "The worst thing that can happen - and has happened in some instances - is to have the power plant ready but the grid connection infrastructure isn't."


Copyright © 1996-2022 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.