Thursday, June 8 2023 Sign In   |    Register

News Quick Search



Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Jun 05
Week of May 29
Week of May 22
Week of May 15
Week of May 08
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization


Pro Plus(+)

Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News

    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    Novel Sustainable Approach for Green Hydrogen Production

    March 22, 2023 - Legal Monitor Worldwide


      When some of the hydrogen in such PEC cells is utilized in situ for a catalytic hydrogenation reaction, the balance shifts, resulting in the co-production of chemicals utilized in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. According to the research, the energy payback time of photoelectrochemical green hydrogen production can be drastically reduced.

      Hydrogen can be produced through water electrolysis, preferably with solar cells or wind power, providing adequate electrical energy. This green hydrogen is expected to play a key role in the future energy system.

      Solar water splitting has made significant progress over the last decade: the best electrolyzers, which attract the required voltage from PV modules or wind power, can now attain efficiencies of up to 30%. This is the indirect method.

      The Direct Approach

      Several groups at the HZB Institute for Solar Fuels are collaborating on a direct approach to solar water splitting. They are constructing photoelectrodes that transform sunlight into electrical energy, are stable in aqueous solutions, and encourage water splitting catalytically. Light absorbers are intently coupled to catalyst materials to form the active component of a photoelectrochemical cell (PEC) in these photoelectrodes.

      The best PEC cells, which use low-cost and stable metal oxide absorbers, already achieve efficiencies of around 10%. Although PEC cells are still less effective than PV-driven electrolyzers, they have significant advantages: for instance, heat from sunlight can be used to expedite reactions in PEC cells.

      Since current densities are ten to a hundred times lower with this strategy, abundant and low-cost materials can be used as catalysts.

      Not Yet Competitive

      Techno-economic analyses (TEA) and net energy assessments (NEA) have revealed that the PEC strategy is not yet cost-effective for large-scale implementation. Today, hydrogen from PEC systems costs about 10 USD/kg, which is roughly six times more expensive than hydrogen from fossil methane steam reforming (1.5 USD/kg).

      Furthermore, the total energy demand for PEC water splitting is expected to be 420 times that of hydrogen production using wind turbines and electrolyzers.

      The Idea: Co-Production of Valuable Chemicals

      This is where we wanted to bring a new approach, states Dr. Fatwa Abdi from the HZB Institute for Solar Fuels. Within the framework of the UniSysCat excellence network partnership between Prof. Reinhard Schomcker and Prof. Roel van de Krol, Abdis team examined how the balance alters when some of the hydrogen produced reacts further with itaconic acid (IA) in the same reactor (in situ) to form methyl succinic acid (MSA).

      Energy Payback Times

      Researchers first estimated how much energy is required to manufacture the PEC cell from light absorbers, catalyst materials, and other materials like glass, as well as how long it must operate in order to generate this energy in the form of chemical energy as hydrogen or MSA.

      This energy payback time for hydrogen alone is around 17 years, assuming a modest 5% solar-to-hydrogen eciency. If only 2% of the hydrogen produced is used to transform IA into MSA, the energy payback time is cut in half, and if 30% of the hydrogen produced is converted into MSA, the production energy can be recovered in just 2 years.

      This makes the process much more sustainable and competitive, notes Abdi. One reason is that the energy required to synthesize MSA in such a PEC cell is only one-seventh of what traditional MSA production processes require.

      The fixed components of the PEC unit, which account for the majority of the investment costs, remain unchanged; only the hydrogenation catalyst and feedstock must be exchanged.


    Other Articles - Utility Business / General


       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.