Thursday, September 21 2023 Sign In   |    Register

News Quick Search



Front Page
Power News
Today's News
Yesterday's News
Week of Sep 18
Week of Sep 11
Week of Sep 04
Week of Aug 28
Week of Aug 21
By Topic
By News Partner
Gas News
News Customization


Pro Plus(+)

Add on products to your professional subscription.
  • Energy Archive News

    Home > News > Power News > News Article

    Share by Email E-mail Printer Friendly Print

    New York’s Solution To Stabilizing Its Ailing Grid? Chase People Out Of State

    May 18, 2023 - Conservative Daily News


      Several blue states are deploying a bold new strategy to keep their electricity grids solvent as they push forward with reckless requirements to meet their electricity needs with unreliable wind and solar generation: Incentivize people to flee their states.

      The poster child for this innovative policy approach is New York. U.S. Census Bureau data show the state lost nearly 300,000 residents in 2022. And they took their pesky penchant for using electricity with them.

      New York has recently enacted a bevy of ill-advised energy policies that require the Empire State to derive 70% of its electricity from renewable energy sources by 2030 — up from just 29% today, ban new natural gas stoves and furnaces in newly constructed buildings by 2026 and shut down six crucial oil and natural gas peaking plants in New York City by 2030.

      These policies will cause electricity demand to skyrocket while reducing the supply of power available because they will shut down the state’s natural gas power plant fleet. These plants are currently the largest sources of electricity in the state, providing New Yorkers with 45% of their electricity in 2021. Surging demand and dwindling electricity supplies will soon make rolling blackouts a real possibility.

      The most important things to know about the electric grid are that the supply of electricity must be in perfect balance with demand at every second of every day, and electricity is consumed at the exact second it is generated. Think of what happens when you unplug a lamp; the light immediately goes out.

      Keeping the lights on is a delicate balancing act. If demand rises as New Yorkers turn on their air conditioners or electric heaters, an electric company must instantaneously increase the supply of power to meet that demand.

      Generating more electricity is relatively easy with dispatchable power plants — plants that can be turned up or down on command — like those fueled with coal, natural gas, and nuclear fuel. But adjusting to second-by-second fluctuations in electricity demand is much more difficult with wind and solar, whose electricity production is dependent on second-by-second fluctuations in the weather.

      New York’s energy policies mean it will become increasingly difficult to provide reliable power as the state becomes more reliant upon intermittent wind and solar to meet its energy needs. As a result, companies will seek to reduce demand rather than increase supply to keep the grid balanced.

      During times of limited power supplies, grid operators will ask customers to voluntarily reduce their consumption, a practice called “demand response” in the utility world. If these voluntary efforts are insufficient, grid operators will be forced to initiate rolling blackouts to keep the grid from crashing.

      This is where the wisdom of New York’s high tax, high crime, and onerous COVID-19 policies shine through. By incentivizing nearly 300,000 residents to flee the state last year, New York lawmakers permanently reduced the state’s electricity demand by nearly 900,000-megawatt hours, by this author’s estimates, which was 1.7% of New York’s 2021 residential electricity consumption.

      A continued diaspora of New Yorkers to freer pastures may help grid operators manage the upcoming challenge of meeting electricity demand with an increasingly unreliable supply.

      However, a better solution to this problem would be to reverse course on these deeply misguided energy mandates and get serious about building new nuclear power plants. Absent this course correction, the last person to leave may not need to turn out the lights.

      Isaac Orr is a policy fellow specializing in energy and environmental policy at Center of the American Experiment, a Minnesota-based think tank.

      The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

      Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

      Support Conservative Daily News with a small donation via Paypal or credit card that will go towards supporting the news and commentary you've come to appreciate.

      The views expressed in content distributed by Newstex and its re-distributors (collectively, "Newstex Authoritative Content") are solely those of the respective author(s) and not necessarily the views of Newstex et al. It is provided as general information only on an "AS IS" basis, without warranties and conferring no rights, which should not be relied upon as professional advice. Newstex et al. make no claims, promises or guarantees regarding its accuracy or completeness, nor as to the quality of the opinions and commentary contained therein.


    Other Articles - Utility Business / General


       Home  -  Feedback  -  Contact Us  -  Safe Sender  -  About Energy Central   
    Copyright © 1996-2023 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Energy Central® and Energy Central Professional® are registered trademarks of CyberTech, Incorporated. Data and information is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended for trading purposes. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. Other terms of use may apply. Membership information is confidential and subject to our privacy agreement.